The Merchants of Faith Are Not a Metaphor

This is the second of four parts. The first described the mechanics: how a truth serves as an anchor for a lie, and how the whole structure then becomes sacred. What remains is the question almost no one asks, because it seems crude — who is making money from this?

It is not crude. It is a biblical category, with a definition, with symptoms, and with a sentence.

The merchants are not a metaphor

The book calls them the new merchants of faith, and some read that as a strong image. It is not an image. It is a biblical category, with a definition, with symptoms, and with a sentence — and the Scriptures speak of it more often than they speak of almost everything else.

Let us begin with the crudest definition, which is Peter's:

But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

2 Peter 2:1-3

Read the expression in the middle again, because it is the whole thesis in five words: “make merchandise of you”. Not “they shall deceive you.” Not “they shall lead you astray.” They will make merchandise of you. The person is not the client of the operation; he is the product.

And note how Peter presents them: not as invaders, but as colleagues. “There shall be false teachers among you” — among you. Inside. With a chair, with a microphone, and with everyone's trust. Peter's false teacher does not arrive from outside to attack the congregation. He grows up inside it, and that is why no one sees him coming.

Paul gives the clinical symptom, and it fits in one line:

Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.

1 Timothy 6:5

Godliness as gain. Not godliness that happens to bring profit — godliness practiced because it brings profit. It is the complete inversion: religion ceases to be the end and becomes the means.

The Book of Mormon gives this inversion a proper name, and the most precise definition I know in any text:

He commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion.

2 Nephi 26:29

Note the care of the definition. It does not say that preaching is priestcraft. It does not say that being known is priestcraft. It says that priestcraft is preaching that they may get gain and praise of the world. What is at issue is not the activity — it is the purpose. Two people can do exactly the same thing at the same pulpit, and one of them may be serving while the other is selling.

And then comes the phrase that separates the two: “but they seek not the welfare of Zion”. That is the criterion, and it is observable. What does this operation, in the end, leave better? The congregation, or the bank account of whoever runs it?

Micah's trio

If there were a single verse to describe what this article is about, it would be this one. It is eight hundred years before Christ and could have been written this week:

The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon the Lord, and say, Is not the Lord among us? none evil can come upon us.

Micah 3:11

Three professions, three forms of corruption, and all three happening at the same time: the head judges for reward, the priest teaches for hire, the prophet divines for money. Micah is not describing three separate scandals. He is describing one arrangement — each covers the other, and the whole has an appearance of legitimacy that none of them would have alone.

And then comes the part that keeps me up at night, which is the second half of the verse: “yet will they lean upon the Lord, and say, Is not the Lord among us? none evil can come upon us.”

It is not that they had abandoned God. It is that they took him with them. The phrase “God is with us” is not here a confession of faith: it is a guarantee of impunity. It is God invoked as insurance against consequences — and that invocation, not the corruption, is what makes Micah 3:11 a text about religion and not merely about politics.

The shepherds who feed themselves

Ezekiel gives the same denunciation from the inside, and with an image that leaves no one comfortable:

Son of man, prophesy against the shepherds of Israel, prophesy, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God unto the shepherds; Woe be to the shepherds of Israel that do feed themselves! should not the shepherds feed the flocks? Ye eat the fat, and ye clothe you with the wool, ye kill them that are fed: but ye feed not the flock. The diseased have ye not strengthened, neither have ye healed that which was sick, neither have ye bound up that which was broken, neither have ye brought again that which was driven away, neither have ye sought that which was lost; but with force and with cruelty have ye ruled them.

Ezekiel 34:2-4

Take inventory of what this shepherd does and does not do. Does: eats the fat, clothes himself with the wool, kills them that are fed, rules with force and cruelty. Does not: strengthen the diseased, heal that which was sick, bind up that which was broken, bring again that which was driven away, seek that which was lost.

Five omissions and four actions, and all the actions are acts of consumption. The flock is not the object of care — it is the source of food. And note the last one: “but with force and with cruelty have ye ruled them”. The cruelty is not a character flaw of this shepherd. It is the method by which the arrangement is maintained.

Jeremiah explains where the message these men preach comes from, and the explanation is so simple it is dismal:

they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord.

Jeremiah 23:16

A vision of their own heart. Not a revelation received and transmitted — their own conviction, projected outward and returned with God's label on it. That is why the message of these men always accompanies, with remarkable precision, what they already had an interest in believing.

Where Jesus and Peter lost their patience

Twice in the Scriptures the response to this is not an argument. It is the only violence the Gospels attribute to Christ:

¶ And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

Matthew 21:12-13

And, in the book of Acts, Peter before a man who wanted to buy the gift of God:

But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.

Acts 8:20

There is no attempt here to understand the other's point of view. There is a door closing. I keep this for when I am accused of being too harsh on this subject: I write articles. The Scriptures overturned tables.

When the thing reaches the ballot box

Everything I have described so far has a practical destination, and it is good to say it without beating around the bush: this apparatus does not exist to produce devotion. It exists to produce votes, money, and impunity — and the three things come together.

The Book of Mormon follows an entire society down this path, and the account is clinical. First, honest citizens begin to support the corrupt because it brings them advantage:

And it came to pass on the other hand, that the Nephites did build them up and support them, beginning at the more wicked part of them, until they had overspread all the land of the Nephites, and had seduced the more part of the righteous until they had come down to believe in their works and partake of their spoils, and to join with them in their secret murders and combinations.

Helaman 6:38

Two things to retain. The first: “beginning at the more wicked part of them” — adherence does not begin in the middle of society; it begins at the fringes and works its way up. The second, and the one that hurts: “had seduced the more part of the righteous”.

The more part of the righteous. Not the wicked. The righteous — the good people, those who went to church, those who had a reputation to lose. And the text says exactly how it happened: “until they had come down to believe in their works and partake of their spoils”. First they believed. Only then did they partake. The belief came before the profit, and it was the belief that opened the door to the profit.

And the outcome:

And thus they did obtain the sole management of the government, insomuch that they did trample under their feet and smite and rend and turn their backs upon the poor and the meek, and the humble followers of God.

Helaman 6:39

Note who suffers in the end: “the poor and the meek, and the humble followers of God”. Not the regime's political adversaries. The poor, the meek, and the humble — that is, exactly the people the Scriptures command us to protect, and exactly the people in whose name all of it had begun.

Ether says where this points, and the formulation is strikingly modern:

For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it up seeketh to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries; and it bringeth to pass the destruction of all people, for it is built up by the devil, who is the father of all lies;

Ether 8:25

To overthrow the freedom — not faith, not morality: freedom. And note the definition of the author of the thing: “the father of all lies”. The text connects, in a single sentence, the destruction of freedom and the factory of lies. They are not two problems. They are the same problem seen from two angles, and that is why an article about disinformation always ends up being an article about power.

Where the algorithm comes in

The half-truth is not an invention of this century. Micah already knew it. What is from this century is the machine that distributes it.

A recommendation algorithm has no opinion on theology. It has one metric: how long the person stayed. And an indignant half-truth retains better than a whole and serene truth — not because it is better, but because indignation is stickier than peace.

The result is that the system promotes deception with no intention whatsoever of deceiving. No one programmed hatred. Retention was programmed, and hatred retains.

It is the difference between a crime and a design flaw — and design flaws are harder to fight, because there is no one to point at.

But there is a second half to this story that must be told, and it is less innocent. The algorithm is blind; the one who learned to feed it is not. A man who discovers that indignation pays more than patience has, from that day on, a permanent economic incentive to produce indignation — and that man is no longer the victim of a design flaw. He is a partner in it.

It is here that Peter's merchants meet the machine. The covetousness is ancient; the distribution is what has become instantaneous, free, and worldwide. What Micah described in one city, a smartphone does across a continent before lunch.

Continues in part 3 — “The anointed of the Lord” does not mean what they make it say.

---

This text develops the introduction and chapters 2 and 7 of The Altar and the Algorithm — How to Identify the New Merchants of Faith. The highlighted passages are quotations from the book. All cited Scriptures were checked against the edition published by the Gospel Library — the Bible of João Ferreira de Almeida in the version the Church uses, the Book of Mormon, and the Doctrine and Covenants. The twelve chapters deal with the rest: the merchants, the money, the pulpit turned into a soapbox, the paid digital militia, and the practical path out.